Skills for Communicating with Patients
Höfundar:
Jonathan Silverman; Suzanne Kurtz; Juliet Draper (Útgáfa: 3)
Kaup valmöguleikar
Skills for Communicating with Patients, Third Edition is one of two companion books on improving communication in medicine, which together provide a comprehensive approach to teaching and learning communication skills throughout all levels of medical education in both specialist and family medicine. Since their publication, the first edition of thi
Nánar um bókina
- Taylor & Francis
- 9781908911162
- 9781138443594
- ePub
- 3
- Jonathan Silverman; Suzanne Kurtz; Juliet Draper
- English
- 2016-03-09
- 100
Kaflar
- Cover
- Title Page
- Copyright Page
- Table of Contents
- Foreword
- Foreword
- Preface to the third edition
- Preface to the second edition
- About this book
- About the authors
- Acknowledgements
- Dedication
- Introduction
- An evidence-based approach
- A skills-based approach
- A unified approach throughout undergraduate, residency and continuing medical education
- A unified approach to communication skills teaching in specialist and family medicine
- A unified approach to communication skills teaching on both sides of the Atlantic and beyond
- Who is the intended audience for this book?
- Learners at all levels of medical education
- Facilitators and programme directors
- Medical education administrators, funding agencies and medical politicians
- How have we addressed style issues in a book intended for the European, North American and wider international market?
- 1 Defining what to teach and learn: an overview of the communication skills curriculum
- Introduction
- More effective consultations
- Improved health outcomes
- A collaborative partnership
- Plan of chapter
- Types of communication skills and how they interrelate
- Example 1
- Example 2
- Example 3
- The problem of separating content and process skills in teaching and learning about the medical interview
- Confusion over process
- Confusion over content
- Marrying content and process
- An overall curriculum of doctor–patient communication skills
- The Calgary–Cambridge Guide (as presented in the 1998 editions of our companion books)
- The enhanced Calgary–Cambridge Guides*
- Three diagrams: the framework of the enhanced Calgary–Cambridge Guides
- The basic framework
- The expanded framework
- An example of the interrelationship between content and process
- Calgary–Cambridge Guides: communication process skills
- CALGARY–CAMBRIDGE GUIDES COMMUNICATION PROCESS SKILLS
- Initiating the session
- Preparation
- Establishing initial rapport
- Identifying the reason(s) for the consultation
- Gathering information
- Exploration of patient’s problems
- Additional skills for understanding the patient’s perspective
- Providing structure to the consultation
- Making organisation overt
- Attending to flow
- Building relationship
- Using appropriate non-verbal behaviour
- Developing rapport
- Involving the patient
- Explanation and planning
- Providing the correct amount and type of information
- Aiding accurate recall and understanding
- Achieving a shared understanding: incorporating the patient’s perspective
- Planning: shared decision making
- Closing the session
- Forward planning
- Ensuring appropriate point of closure
- Options in explanation and planning (includes content and process skills)
- If discussing opinion and significance of problem
- If negotiating mutual plan of action
- If discussing investigations and procedures
- Calgary–Cambridge Guides: communication content
- The need for a clear overall structure
- Choosing the process skills to include in the communication curriculum
- The research and theoretical basis that validates the inclusion of each individual skill
- Underlying goals and principles of communication that helped in choosing the skills
- Skills and individuality
- Relating specific issues to core communication skills
- Summary
- 2 Initiating the session
- Introduction
- Problems in communication
- Objectives
- Skills
- ‘What’ to teach and learn about the initiation: the evidence for the skills
- PREPARATION
- ESTABLISHING INITIAL RAPPORT
- Greeting the patient and introducing yourself
- Clarifying your role and the nature of the interview
- Obtaining the patient’s name
- Demonstrating interest and respect, attending to the patient’s physical comfort
- IDENTIFYING THE REASON(S) FOR THE CONSULTATION
- The opening question
- New consultations
- Follow-up visits
- Listening to the patient’s opening statement
- Learning how to listen at the beginning of the consultation is the first step to an efficient and accurate consultation
- Listening rather than questioning allows doctors and patients to achieve more of their objectives for this part of the consultation
- What is the evidence to support listening?
- What are the specific skills of attentive listening?
- What are the advantages of attentive listening?
- Screening
- The balance between listening and screening
- Agenda setting
- Summary
- 3 Gathering information
- Introduction
- Problems in communication
- Objectives
- The content of information gathering in medical interviews
- The traditional medical history
- Origins of the traditional method
- Strengths
- Weaknesses
- The disease–illness model
- Definition of disease and illness
- Why doctors need to explore both perspectives
- An alternative template for the content of the information-gathering section of the interview
- The biomedical perspective
- The patient’s perspective
- Background information: context
- The process skills of information gathering
- Exploration of the Patient’s Problems
- Questioning techniques
- What are open and closed questions?
- When should we use open and closed methods: the open-to-closed cone
- What are the advantages of open questioning techniques?
- Why is it important to move from open to closed questioning techniques?
- What is the evidence for the value of open and closed questioning techniques?
- Eliciting the patient’s narrative
- Attentive listening
- Facilitative response
- Encouragement
- Use of silence
- Repetition or echoing
- Paraphrasing
- Sharing your thoughts
- What is the theoretical evidence for facilitation?
- Picking up verbal and non-verbal cues
- Clarification of the patient’s story
- Internal summary
- Accuracy
- Facilitation
- Language
- Additional Skills for Understanding the Patient’s Perspective
- What is the evidence to support exploring the patient’s perspective of their illness?
- Anthropological and cross-cultural studies
- Outcome studies
- Satisfaction and compliance studies
- Understanding and recall studies
- Are patient-centred interviews longer?
- How to discover the patient’s perspective
- Picking up and checking out cues
- Asking specifically about the patient’s illness perspective
- Feelings
- Effect on life
- Putting The Process Skills of Information Gathering together
- The continuum of open to closed questioning techniques
- The complete versus the focused history in information gathering
- The effect of clinical reasoning on the process of information gathering
- More advanced hypothetico-deductive reasoning
- Schema-driven approach
- Pattern recognition
- How do these different clinical reasoning approaches influence the process of information gathering?
- Summary
- 4 Providing structure to the interview
- Introduction
- Objectives
- Skills
- ‘What’ to teach and learn about providing structure: the evidence for the skills
- Making Organisation Overt
- Summarising
- What is summarising?
- Why is internal summary a key skill in structuring the consultation?
- What is the evidence for the value of summarising in the medical interview?
- Signposting
- What is signposting?
- Attending to Flow
- Sequencing
- Timing
- Summary
- 5 Building the relationship
- Introduction
- Problems in communication
- Objectives
- Skills
- ‘What’ to teach and learn about building the relationship: the evidence for the skills
- Using Appropriate Non-Verbal Communication
- What is the difference between verbal and non-verbal communication?
- Why understanding non-verbal communication can make a difference in the consultation
- What is the research evidence that non-verbal communication makes a difference to the consultation?
- What then are the lessons for physicians?
- Reading the non-verbal cues of patients
- Transmitting your own non-verbal cues
- Use of notes and computers
- Developing Rapport
- Acceptance
- The accepting response
- Functions of the accepting response
- Skills of the accepting response
- Responding to overt feelings and emotions
- Responding to indirectly expressed feelings and emotions
- Acceptance is not agreement
- The problem of premature reassurance
- Empathy
- Understanding the patient’s predicament and feelings
- Communicating empathy to the patient
- Support
- What is the research evidence that rapport-building skills make a difference to the medical consultation?
- Involving the Patient
- Sharing of thoughts
- Providing rationale
- Summary
- 6 Explanation and planning
- Introduction
- Problems in communication
- Are there problems with the amount of information that doctors give?
- Are there problems with the type of information that doctors give?
- Can patients understand the language that doctors use?
- Do patients recall and understand the information that we give?
- Are patients involved in decision making and to the level that they would wish?
- Do patients comply or adhere to the plans that we make?
- Are there problems in the teaching and learning of explanation and planning in medical education?
- Are these problems improving with time?
- How does all of this relate to the growing field of health literacy?
- Objectives
- The content of explanation and planning
- The process skills of explanation and planning
- Communication process skills: the evidence
- Providing the Correct Amount and Type of Information
- Do patients and doctors disagree over the amount of information that should be imparted?
- The traditional view of the doctor–patient relationship
- An unbridgeable competence gap
- The emotional nature of illness
- Professional authority
- Why has modern research been misinterpreted as confirming the traditional stereotype of information giving?
- Early studies of recall of information
- More recent studies
- Confirmation of prejudices
- What recent trends in society have influenced medical information giving?
- Changes in society
- Changes in medicine
- Patient autonomy
- What is the research evidence to suggest that giving more information is helpful?
- Do all patients want more information?
- What skills can learners use to help gauge the correct amount and type of information to give to each individual patient?
- Chunking and checking
- Assessing the patient’s starting point
- Asking patients what other information would be helpful
- Giving explanation at appropriate times
- Aiding Accurate Recall and Understanding
- Ley’s research into patient recall
- Categorisation: an example of signposting
- Labelling important information: another example of signposting
- Chunking and checking
- Repetition
- Language
- Making explanations or advice specific enough for the patient to understand or act upon
- Using visual methods of conveying information
- Achieving a Shared Understanding – Incorporating the Patient’s Perspective
- Tuckett and colleagues’ research into patient understanding
- The methodology of Tuckett and colleagues
- What does the research of Tuckett and colleagues show about the information given by doctors?
- What does the research of Tuckett and his colleagues show about the influence patients can have on their doctors’ information giving?
- What are the combined effects of patients’ and doctors’ approaches to patient involvement in information giving?
- Can doctors and patients more positively influence each other towards a shared understanding in information giving?
- Does the research of Tuckett et al. about recall fit in with previous work?
- Was correct sense made of the explanations?
- Were patients committed to the doctor’s view?
- What are the main conclusions of Tuckett and colleagues?
- Other work to support shared understanding
- What skills can we recommend to help learners achieve a shared understanding with their patients?
- Relating explanations to the patient’s perspective
- Providing opportunities and encouraging the patient to contribute
- Picking up verbal and non-verbal cues
- Eliciting the patient’s beliefs, reactions and concerns
- Planning – Shared Decision Making
- Theoretical concepts behind shared decision making
- The mutuality model
- The shared decision-making model
- From compliance to concordance
- The research evidence to support shared decision making
- Do all patients want to be involved in shared decision making?
- What skills can we recommend to learners to help them achieve shared decision making in planning?
- Sharing own thinking as appropriate: ideas, thought processes and dilemmas
- Involving the patient
- Offering suggestions and choices rather than directives
- Encouraging the patient to contribute their ideas and suggestions
- Exploring management options with the patient
- Risk communication
- Decision aids
- Establishing the level of involvement the patient wishes
- Negotiating a mutually acceptable plan
- Signposting position of equipoise or own preferences
- Establishing the patient’s preferences
- Negotiating differences
- Checking with the patient
- Options in Explanation and Planning
- If offering opinion and discussing significance of problems
- If negotiating a mutual plan of action
- Discussing and offering options in management and treatment
- Providing information on action or treatment offered
- Obtaining the patient’s view of need for action, perceived benefits, barriers and motivation
- Motivational interviewing
- Accepting patient’s views and advocating an alternative viewpoint as necessary
- Challenging and confronting patients
- If discussing investigations and procedures
- Summary: explanation and planning is an interactive process
- 7 Closing the session
- Introduction
- Objectives
- The process skills for closing the session
- ‘What’ to teach and learn about endings: the evidence for the skills
- What actually happens in the closing section of the interview?
- What behaviours earlier in the visit prevent new problems from arising during closure?
- What communication skills can we recommend in the earlier sections of the consultation that will aid efficient and satisfactory closure of the session?
- What behaviours during closure are associated with inefficient endings?
- What are the specific elements of closure itself (see Box 7.1)?
- Forward planning
- Contracting
- Safety-netting
- Ensuring appropriate point of closure
- End summary
- Final checking
- Summary
- 8 Relating specific issues to core communication skills
- Introduction
- Specific issues
- Breaking bad news
- Key skills of the Calgary–Cambridge Guides to apply with greater depth, intention and intensity
- Cultural and social diversity
- Common issues and barriers in cross-cultural communication and social diversity
- Key skills of the Calgary–Cambridge Guides that need applying with greater depth, intention and intensity
- Age-related issues
- Communicating with older patients
- Key skills of the Calgary–Cambridge Guides to apply with greater depth, intention and intensity
- Communicating with children and parents
- Key skills of the Calgary–Cambridge Guides that need applying with greater depth, intention and intensity
- The telephone interview
- Key skills of the Calgary–Cambridge Guides that need applying with greater depth, intention and intensity
- Patients with mental illness
- Uncovering hidden depression and assessing suicidal risk
- Key skills of the Calgary–Cambridge Guides that need applying with greater depth, intention and intensity
- The psychotic patient
- Key skills of the Calgary–Cambridge Guides that need applying with greater depth, intention and intensity
- Examples of specific phrasing
- The open-to-closed cone
- Empathy without collusion
- Combining advocacy and support with challenge
- Gathering information from others
- Interviewing the older patient with mental illness
- Medically unexplained symptoms
- Other communication issues
- Further reading
- References
- Index
- Author index