Legal Ethics
Kaup valmöguleikar
The most student-focused guide to legal ethics, encouraging questioning, reflection and discussion to develop a personal response to ethical issues. Who would or should defend a potential murderer in court? How do professions regulate themselves? Is 'no win-no fee' an ethical system? Where is the line in a 'suitable' client-advocate relationship? Jonathan Herring provides a clear and engaging overview of legal ethics, highlighting that the issues surrounding professional conduct are not always black and white and raising interesting questions about how lawyers act and what their role entails.
Key topics, such as confidentiality, negligence, and fees are covered, with references throughout to the professional codes of conduct. Features throughout the textbook to aid student learning include: - Highlighting of key cases, principles, and definitions - Inclusion of a variety of viewpoints through coverage of cases, popular media, and scholarly articles - Use of 'digging deeper' and 'alternative viewpoint' boxes which encourage critical reflection and better understanding of key theories and topics - Extracts from the professional handbooks and codes of conduct are explained in detail in 'Follow the code' boxes New to this edition: - Updated content in light of new editions of professional guidance - New material on use of social media - Examination of developments in professional ethics regarding sexual misconduct - Greater focus and coverage on the importance of diversity Digital formats and resources The 3rd edition is available for students and institutions to purchase in a variety of formats.
Nánar um bókina
- Oxford University Press Academic UK
- 9780192576491
- 9780198840046
- ePub
- 3
- Jonathan Herring
- English
- 2023-09-26
- 100
- 2
- 2
Kaflar
- Cover Page
- Frontispiece
- Title page
- Copyright page
- Preface
- Guide to the features in Legal Ethics
- Key issues ● Introduction
- Follow the Code ● Key statute ● Key case
- Digging deeper ● Alternative view ● Application
- Definition ● Example ● Scandal!
- What would you do?
- Conclusion ● Further reading
- Table of Contents
- Table of cases
- United Kingdom
- EUROPEAN UNION
- Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)
- European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)
- NATIONAL COURTS
- Australia
- Canada
- United States
- Table of statutes and professional codes
- UK statutes
- International Treaties and Conventions
- UK secondary legislation
- European secondary legislation
- SRA non-statutory rules
- Codes of Practice
- 1 Ethical theories
- 1.1 Introduction
- 1.2 Lawyers and legal ethics
- 1.3 The role of ethics
- 1.3.1 Norms and ethics
- 1.3.2 Law and ethics
- 1.4 Ethical disagreements
- 1.4.1 The overarching approach
- 1.4.2 Minimum requirements or maximally ethical
- 1.4.3 Guiding me or judging others?
- 1.4.4 Ethics and regulation
- 1.4.5 People and acts
- 1.5 General ethical principles
- 1.5.1 Consequentialism
- 1.5.1.1 Problems with consequentialism
- 1.5.2 Rule consequentialism
- 1.5.2.1 Problems with rule consequentialism
- 1.5.3 Deontology
- 1.5.3.1 Problems with deontology
- 1.5.3.2 Applying deontology: Principlism
- Autonomy
- Non-maleficence
- Beneficence
- Justice
- Applying the principles
- Critics of principlism
- 1.5.4 Virtue ethics
- 1.5.4.1 Problems with virtue ethics
- 1.5.5 Feminist ethics
- 1.5.5.1 Problems with feminist ethics
- 1.5.6 Ethics of care
- 1.5.6.1 Problems with ethics of care
- 1.6 Are lawyers’ ethics special?
- 1.7 The role of the lawyer
- 1.7.1 Partisanship
- 1.7.1.1 Hyper-zeal
- 1.7.1.2 Moderate zeal
- 1.7.1.3 Criticism of zealousness
- 1.7.2 Neutrality
- 1.7.3 Fiduciary
- 1.7.4 Justice
- 1.7.5 Care
- 1.8 Should law degrees include ethics?
- 1.9 Professional codes
- 1.10 Conclusion
- Further reading
- 2 The social context of the legal profession
- 2.1 Introduction
- 2.2 Professionalism
- 2.3 The social place of lawyers
- 2.3.1 Their political role
- 2.3.2 Power
- 2.3.3 Knowledge
- 2.3.4 Social status
- 2.3.5 Ethics
- 2.4 ‘The crisis of legal professionalism’
- 2.4.1 Legal aid
- 2.4.2 Internationalisation
- 2.4.3 Challenges to monopoly
- 2.4.4 Quality of service
- 2.4.5 Trust
- 2.4.6 Too many lawyers?
- 2.4.7 Lawyers as servant
- 2.4.8 Specialism
- 2.4.9 Mental health
- 2.5 Culture
- 2.6 Legal executives
- 2.7 Anti-lawyers
- 2.8 Conclusion
- Further reading
- 3 Gender, race, and diversity in the legal profession
- 3.1 Introduction
- 3.2 The meaning of ‘diversity’
- 3.2.1 Formal diversity
- 3.2.2 Substantive diversity
- 3.2.3 Diversity and attitude
- 3.3 Why promote diversity?
- 3.3.1 Benefits to the profession
- 3.3.2 Fairness
- 3.3.3 Social good
- 3.3.4 Summary
- 3.4 The current status of the profession in terms of diversity
- 3.4.1 Gender
- 3.4.1.1 Solicitors
- 3.4.1.2 Bar
- 3.4.2 Race
- 3.4.2.1 Solicitors
- 3.4.2.2 Bar
- 3.4.3 Disability
- 3.4.4 Class
- 3.4.5 Complaints
- 3.4.6 Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex (LGBTQI)
- 3.5 Diversity and the judiciary
- 3.6 The Equality Act 2010
- 3.7 The SRA Code
- 3.8 The BSB Handbook
- 3.9 Barriers to diversity
- 3.9.1 Expense
- 3.9.2 Work experience
- 3.9.3 Perception
- 3.9.4 Choice
- 3.9.5 Legal culture
- 3.9.6 Unclear promotion
- 3.9.7 Stereotypes
- 3.10 Practical steps to promote diversity
- 3.10.1 Financial support
- 3.10.2 Recruitment
- 3.10.3 Monitoring
- 3.10.4 Cultural changes
- 3.10.5 Promotion
- 3.10.6 Mentoring
- 3.10.7 Flexible times
- 3.10.8 Quotas and positive action
- 3.11 No hope
- 3.12 Are women lawyers different?
- 3.13 Conclusion
- Further reading
- 4 The regulation of the legal profession
- 4.1 Introduction
- 4.2 The need for regulation
- 4.3 Styles of regulation
- 4.4 Who can practise law?
- 4.5 Regulatory bodies
- 4.5.1 The Legal Services Board
- 4.5.2 The Solicitors Regulation Authority
- 4.5.3 Enforcement
- 4.5.4 The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal
- 4.5.5 The Bar Standards Board
- 4.5.6 The Bar Tribunals and Adjudication Service
- 4.5.7 The Legal Ombudsman
- 4.5.8 Other regulators
- 4.5.8.1 Discussion of the complaints procedures
- 4.6 Self-regulation
- 4.6.1 The SRA Handbook
- 4.6.1.1 Principles-based regulation
- 4.6.1.2 The seven Principles
- 4.6.1.3 Applying the Principles
- 4.6.1.4 Principle 1: Justice and the Rule of Law
- 4.6.1.5 Principle 2: Public Trust
- 4.6.1.6 Principle 3: Independence
- 4.6.1.7 Principle 4: Honesty
- 4.6.1.8 Principle 5: Integrity
- 4.6.1.9 Principle 6: Equality and Diversity
- 4.6.1.10 Principle 7: Best interests of the client
- 4.6.1.11 Code of Conduct
- 4.6.2 The BSB Handbook
- 4.7 Issues around codes
- 4.7.1 How detailed the guidance should be
- 4.7.2 Are codes about enforcement?
- 4.7.3 One code for all lawyers?
- 4.7.4 The legal status of codes
- 4.8 Alternatives
- 4.9 Complaints about solicitors
- 4.9.1 Misuse of regulation
- 4.10 Barristers
- 4.10.1 Bar Standards Board complaints procedure
- 4.10.2 The structure of the barristers’ profession
- 4.10.2.1 Chambers
- 4.10.2.2 Barristers and briefs
- 4.10.3 Becoming a King’s Counsel
- 4.11 McKenzie friend
- 4.12 Alternative business structures
- 4.13 Legal education
- 4.13.1 Solicitors Qualifying Examination
- 4.13.2 Apprenticeship
- 4.13.3 How law is to be taught at universities
- 4.13.4 The vocational year for barristers
- 4.13.5 Continuous professional development
- 4.13.6 The place of ethics in legal education
- 4.13.7 The delivery of ethics
- 4.14 Conclusion
- Further reading
- 5 The lawyer–client relationship
- 5.1 Introduction
- 5.2 The professional codes
- 5.2.1 Who defines a client’s interests?
- 5.2.2 Balancing the interests of clients and others
- 5.2.3 Agency
- 5.2.4 Contractual relationship
- 5.2.5 The fiduciary model
- 5.3 The ‘standard conception’
- 5.3.1 Partisanship
- 5.3.2 Neutrality
- 5.3.3 Non-accountability
- 5.3.4 Justifications for the standard conception
- 5.3.5 Objections to the standard conception
- 5.4 Alternatives to the standard conception
- 5.4.1 Bradley Wendel
- 5.4.2 William Simon
- 5.4.3 Ethics of care
- 5.5 The differing models
- 5.6 Advertising
- 5.7 The cab-rank rule
- 5.7.1 The justification for the rule
- 5.7.2 The cab-rank rule in practice
- 5.8 Solicitors and client choice
- 5.9 Who is the client?
- 5.10 Referrals
- 5.11 Ending a relationship with a client
- 5.12 Conclusion
- Further reading
- 6 Confidentiality
- 6.1 Introduction
- 6.2 The protection of lawyer–client communications
- 6.3 Professional guidance
- 6.4 Confidentiality
- 6.5 Legal professional privilege
- 6.5.1 Communications between lawyer and client
- 6.5.2 Communications between lawyers and third parties
- 6.5.3 Who can plead the privilege?
- 6.5.4 Exceptions to privilege and confidentiality
- 6.5.4.1 Consent/waiver
- 6.5.4.2 The criminal activity exception
- 6.5.4.3 The Children Act 1989
- 6.5.4.4 Duty to the court
- 6.5.4.5 Legal obligation to disclose
- 6.5.4.6 Disclosure in the public interest
- 6.5.4.7 Statute
- 6.5.4.8 Client–solicitor litigation
- 6.5.4.9 Mediation
- 6.5.4.10 Joint retainers
- 6.6 Duty to disclose
- 6.7 Against privilege
- 6.8 Conclusion
- Further reading
- 7 Conflicts of interests
- 7.1 Introduction
- 7.2 The basic principles
- 7.3 The professional codes
- 7.3.1 The SRA Code of Conduct
- 7.3.2 The Bar Standards Board Handbook
- 7.4 The ethical basis for the principle
- 7.4.1 The problem of the real world
- 7.4.2 The remedy
- 7.5 What is a ‘conflict of interest’?
- 7.5.1 Own interests
- 7.5.2 What interests are covered?
- 7.5.3 A risk of conflict?
- 7.5.4 How direct must the conflict be?
- 7.5.5 Who is a client?
- 7.5.6 New clients
- 7.6 Exceptions
- 7.6.1 Consent and common interest
- 7.6.2 Informational barriers or ethical screens
- 7.6.3 Merging firms
- 7.6.4 Conflict arising between existing clients
- 7.6.5 Criminal cases and clients
- 7.6.6 Buyer and seller
- 7.6.7 Family cases
- 7.6.8 Group litigation
- 7.7 Conclusion
- Further reading
- 8 Fees
- 8.1 Introduction
- 8.2 Sources and forms of funding
- 8.3 Ethics and fees
- 8.4 Contingency fees
- 8.4.1 Conditional fee agreements
- 8.4.2 ‘Damages-based agreements’
- 8.4.3 The operation of contingency fees
- 8.4.4 In favour of contingency fees
- 8.4.5 Against contingency fees
- 8.4.6 Claims companies
- 8.5 Speculative fees
- 8.6 Damages-based agreements
- 8.7 Insurance
- 8.7.1 Commission
- 8.8 Hourly fees
- 8.9 Court assessment
- 8.10 Solicitors Regulation Authority review
- 8.11 Legal proceedings to recover fees
- 8.12 Client funds
- 8.12.1 Separate accounts
- 8.12.2 Interest on client’s account
- 8.13 Legal aid
- 8.13.1 The problem with the previous regime
- 8.13.2 The cuts
- 8.13.3 The case for cuts
- 8.13.4 The case against the cuts
- 8.13.4.1 Human rights
- 8.13.4.2 False economy
- 8.13.5 Criminal law
- 8.13.6 Family law
- 8.13.7 Access to justice
- 8.14 Conclusion
- Further reading
- 9 Negligence and lawyers
- 9.1 Introduction
- 9.2 Contract
- 9.2.1 Is there a contract?
- 9.2.2 What are the terms of the contract?
- 9.3 Fiduciary duties
- 9.4 The basic principles of negligence
- 9.4.1 Establishing a duty of care
- 9.4.2 Duty of care to third parties
- 9.4.3 Breach of the duty
- 9.4.3.1 Knowledge of the law
- 9.4.3.2 Lawyers and specialisation
- 9.4.3.3 The burden of proof
- 9.4.3.4 Practical advice
- 9.4.3.5 Settlement
- 9.4.3.6 Following the instructions of a client
- 9.4.3.7 Solicitors following the advice of a barrister
- 9.4.3.8 Barristers
- 9.4.4 Loss caused by breach of the duty
- 9.5 Illegality
- 9.6 The removal of immunity
- 9.7 Conclusion
- Further reading
- 10 Litigation
- 10.1 Introduction
- 10.2 Theories of litigation
- 10.3 Is litigation good?
- 10.4 Adversarial litigation
- 10.5 Inquisitorial adjudication
- 10.6 SLAPPS (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation)
- 10.7 Criminal litigation
- 10.7.1 Funding
- 10.7.2 Investigation
- 10.7.3 The decision to prosecute
- 10.7.4 The client who confesses guilt
- 10.7.5 The quality of defence lawyers
- 10.7.6 Victims and witnesses
- 10.7.6.1 In favour of strong cross-examination
- 10.7.6.2 Against strong cross-examination
- 10.7.6.3 Legal protections
- 10.7.7 Plea bargaining
- 10.8 Civil litigation
- 10.8.1 Costs
- 10.8.2 The ‘crisis in civil litigation’
- 10.8.3 Justice
- 10.9 Advocacy
- 10.9.1 Regulation of advocacy
- 10.9.2 The role of the advocate
- 10.9.3 The advocate’s duty to the witness
- 10.10 Duty to court
- 10.11 Duty to other legal professionals
- 10.12 Conclusion
- Further reading
- 11 Alternative dispute resolution
- 11.1 Introduction
- 11.2 The forms of ADR
- 11.3 Negotiation
- 11.3.1 Theories of negotiation
- 11.3.1.1 The approach to negotiation
- 11.3.1.2 The importance of bargaining power
- 11.3.1.3 The ‘shadow of the law’
- 11.3.2 The role of the lawyer
- 11.3.3 Lying and negotiation
- 11.3.4 Regulatory possibilities
- 11.4 Mediation
- 11.4.1 What is mediation?
- 11.4.2 The role of the mediator
- 11.4.3 The case in favour of mediation
- 11.4.4 The case against mediation
- 11.4.5 Lawyers and mediation
- 11.4.6 Mediation and confidentiality
- 11.5 Collaborative law
- 11.6 Arbitration
- 11.7 Conclusion
- Further reading
- 12 Third parties
- 12.1 Introduction
- 12.2 General principles: Unfair advantage
- 12.3 Correcting mistakes of third parties
- 12.4 Threatening to bring a hopeless application
- 12.5 Offensive behaviour
- 12.6 Undertakings
- 12.6.1 Breach of an undertaking
- 12.6.2 Who is bound by an undertaking?
- 12.6.3 Enforcing undertakings
- 12.7 Contacting opposing party
- 12.8 Unrepresented parties
- 12.9 Tort duties to third parties
- 12.9.1 Third parties and fees
- 12.9.2 Wasted costs orders
- 12.9.2.1 Problems with wasted costs orders
- 12.10 Broader ethical issues
- 12.11 Conclusion
- Further reading
- 13 Business ethics
- 13.1 Introduction
- 13.2 Why business ethics matter
- 13.3 Is a company a moral agent?
- 13.3.1 The moral aim of the company
- 13.3.1.1 The shareholder interest
- 13.3.1.2 The stakeholder interest
- 13.3.2 Corporate social responsibility
- 13.3.3 Sustainability
- 13.3.4 Corporate accountability
- 13.3.5 Corporate citizenship
- 13.3.6 International responsibilities
- 13.3.6.1 Sweatshops
- 13.4 Business ethics management
- 13.4.1 Mission statements or value statements
- 13.4.2 Codes of ethics
- 13.4.3 Ethics managers
- 13.4.4 Ethics consultants and training
- 13.4.5 Auditing and reporting
- 13.5 Lawyers and business ethics
- 13.6 Conclusion
- Further reading
- 14 Lawyers’ social responsibilities
- 14.1 Introduction
- 14.2 The theory
- 14.3 The codes
- 14.4 Criminal law
- 14.4.1 Money laundering
- 14.4.1.1 Concerns about money-laundering legislation
- 14.4.2 Tax avoidance
- 14.5 Duty to the court
- 14.6 Duties to the public
- 14.7 Pro bono
- 14.7.1 The case for pro bono work
- 14.7.2 Concerns about pro bono
- 14.7.3 Pro bono work in practice
- 14.8 Obligations to the Legal Aid Agency
- 14.9 Reporting other solicitors
- 14.10 Conclusion
- Further reading
- 15 Applying ethical theories
- 15.1 Introduction
- 15.2 The general principles
- 15.2.1 Lawyer 1
- 15.2.2 Lawyer 2
- 15.2.3 Lawyer 3
- 15.2.4 Lawyer 4
- 15.3 Criminal law
- 15.3.1 The cross-examination
- 15.3.1.1 Lawyer 1
- 15.3.1.2 Lawyer 2
- 15.3.1.3 Lawyer 3
- 15.3.1.4 Lawyer 4
- 15.3.2 Admission of guilt
- 15.3.2.1 Lawyer 1
- 15.3.2.2 Lawyer 2
- 15.3.2.3 Lawyer 3
- 15.3.2.4 Lawyer 4
- 15.3.3 Plea bargain
- 15.3.3.1 Lawyer 1
- 15.3.3.2 Lawyer 2
- 15.3.3.3 Lawyer 3
- 15.3.3.4 Lawyer 4
- 15.4 Commercial law
- 15.4.1 Lawyer 1
- 15.4.2 Lawyer 2
- 15.4.3 Lawyer 3
- 15.4.4 Lawyer 4
- 15.5 Family law
- 15.5.1 Lawyer 1
- 15.5.2 Lawyer 2
- 15.5.3 Lawyer 3
- 15.5.4 Lawyer 4
- 15.6 Conclusion
- Index