A Philosophical Exploration of the Humanities and Social Sciences

Höfundar: Giorgio Baruchello; Ársæll Már Arnarsson (Útgáfa: 1)
A Philosophical Exploration of the Humanities and Social Sciences

Kaup valmöguleikar

Humor has been praised by philosophers and poets as a balm to soothe the sorrows that outrageous fortune’s slings and arrows cause inevitably, if not incessantly, to each and every one of us. In mundane life, having a sense of humor is seen not only as a positive trait of character, but as a social prerequisite, without which a person’s career and mating prospects are severely diminished, if not annihilated.

However, humor is much more than this, and so much else. In particular, humor can accompany cruelty, inform it, sustain it, and exemplify it. Therefore, in this book, we provide a comprehensive, reasoned exploration of the vast literature on the concepts of humor and cruelty, as these have been tackled in Western philosophy, humanities, and social sciences, especially psychology. Also, the apparent cacophony of extant interpretations of these two concepts is explained as the inevitable and even useful result of the polysemy inherent to all common-sense concepts, in line with the understanding of concepts developed by M.

Polanyi in the 20th century. Thus, a thorough, nuanced grasp of their complex mutual relationship is established, and many platitudes affecting today's received views, and scholarship, are cast aside. "Like Aristotle and Dewey, Arnarsson and Baruchello do not define their terms at the outset, but instead they relentlessly pursue the meanings of two ordinary words that everyone vaguely understads to arrive at a critical insight into the concepts these words represent, which are both disparate and interrelated.

Nánar um bókina

Útgefandi
De Gruyter
ISBN
9783110760019
Print ISBN
9783110759761
Format
ePub
Útgáfa
1
Höfundar
Giorgio Baruchello; Ársæll Már Arnarsson
Tungumál
English
Útgefið
2022-11-07
Prent takmörkun á líftíma
100
Prent takmörkun
2
Afritunar takmörkun
2

Kaflar

  • Acknowledgements
  • List of Abbreviations
  • 1 Concerning Concepts
  • 1.1 Exploring in Order to Map
  • 1.2 Mapping the Exploration Itself
  • 2 Humour in Philosophy and the Humanities
  • 2.1 Six Twists of Irony
  • 2.1.1 Ages
  • 2.1.2 Aids
  • 2.1.3 Arts
  • 2.1.4 Anglicisms
  • 2.1.5 Amnesias
  • 2.1.6 Ambiguities
  • 2.2 Six Anglophone Sources
  • 2.2.1 Shaftesbury
  • 2.2.2 The Spectator
  • 2.2.3 Hartley
  • 2.2.4 Beattie
  • 2.2.5 Hazlitt
  • 2.2.6 Santayana
  • 2.3 Six Allophone Sources
  • 2.3.1 Kierkegaard
  • 2.3.2 Schopenhauer
  • 2.3.3 Bergson
  • 2.3.4 Pirandello
  • 2.3.5 Cassirer
  • 2.3.6 Deleuze
  • 3 Humour in Psychology and the Social Sciences
  • 3.1 Three Enduring Challenges
  • 3.1.1 Working Definitions
  • 3.1.2 Jokes, Laughter, and “Humour” Proper
  • 3.1.3 Pre-Paradigmatic Conundrums
  • 3.2 Four Enabling Conceptions
  • 3.2.1 Superiority
  • 3.2.2 Incongruity
  • 3.2.3 Relief
  • 3.2.4 Eclecticism
  • 3.3 Five Eminent Classics
  • 3.3.1 Darwin
  • 3.3.2 Bergson, encore une fois
  • 3.3.3 Freud
  • 3.3.4 Koestler
  • 3.3.5 Harlow
  • 3.4 Nine Expert Approaches
  • 3.4.1 Sexual Selection
  • 3.4.2 Cognitive Theories
  • 3.4.3 Evolutionary Theories
  • 3.4.4 Humanistic Theories
  • 3.4.5 Error Detection
  • 3.4.6 False-Alarm Detection
  • 3.4.7 Four Communicative Functions
  • 3.4.8 Benign Violation
  • 3.4.9 Personality Traits
  • 3.5 Intermediate Remarks
  • 4 Cruelty in Philosophy and the Humanities
  • 4.1 Cruelty as a Vice of the Punishing Person
  • 4.1.1 Seneca
  • 4.1.2 Aquinas
  • 4.1.3 Pre-Modernity
  • 4.2 Cruelty as a Vice of the Unravelling Person
  • 4.2.1 Montaigne
  • 4.2.2 Britons
  • 4.2.3 Inconceivability
  • 4.3 Cruelty as a Curable Social Evil
  • 4.3.1 Enlightenment
  • 4.3.2 Pessimism
  • 4.3.3 Lecky
  • 4.3.4 Liberals
  • 4.3.5 Regan
  • 4.4 Cruelty as a Paradox
  • 4.4.1 Humiliation
  • 4.4.2 “Cruelty and Liberalism”
  • 4.4.3 Penology
  • 4.4.4 Lifers, Labourers, and Livestock
  • 4.4.5 Hallie
  • 4.4.6 Paradoxes
  • 4.5 Cruelty as a Concealed Constructive Good
  • 4.5.1 Social Value
  • 4.5.2 Existential Value
  • 4.5.3 Intrinsic Value
  • 5 Cruelty in Psychology and the Social Sciences
  • 5.1 ‘Cruelty’ as a Problem
  • 5.1.1 Definitions
  • 5.1.2 ‘Others’
  • 5.1.3 Psychopaths
  • 5.1.4 Needs
  • 5.1.5 Children
  • 5.1.6 Experiments
  • 5.2 Cruelty as a Theoretical Issue
  • 5.2.1 Conflict
  • 5.2.2 Situationism
  • 5.2.3 Interactionism
  • 5.2.4 Illness
  • 5.2.5 Psychodynamics
  • 5.2.6 Behaviourism
  • 5.2.7 Hormonal Imbalances
  • 5.2.8 Neuropsychology
  • 5.2.9 Cognitivism
  • 5.2.10 Empathy
  • 5.2.11 Evolution
  • 5.2.13 Nell
  • 5.2.14 Exposure
  • 5.2.15 Morality
  • 5.3 Sadism as a Problem
  • 5.3.1 Delinquency
  • 5.3.2 Development
  • 5.3.3 Drives
  • 5.4 Cruelty as Self-Protection
  • 5.4.1 Ainslie
  • 5.4.2 Aches
  • 6 Concluding Concepts
  • 6.1 Humours and Cruelties
  • 6.1.1 As Fluid as Humour
  • 6.1.2 As Cruel as Science
  • 6.1.3 As Personal as Both ‘Humour’ and ‘Cruelty’
  • 6.2 Humour
  • 6.2.1 Epistemic Considerations
  • 6.2.2 Ethical Considerations
  • 6.3 Cruelty
  • 6.3.1 Epistemic Considerations
  • 6.3.2 Ethical Considerations
  • 6.3.3 Existential Considerations
  • 6.4 Humour and Cruelty
  • 6.4.1 Epistemic Considerations
  • 6.4.2 Ethical Considerations
  • 6.4.3 Existential Considerations
  • Bibliography
  • Index